Gastritis refers to a number of conditions that are all primarily characterized by the inflammation of the stomach lining. These conditions can cause a variety of symptoms. Patients with gastritis particularly experience having a burning ache in their upper abdomen, nausea, vomiting, and bloating or feeling full after eating. In severe cases, gastritis can also cause a patient to vomit blood, have blood in their stools, or have stools that appear black in color.

There are several reasons why patients develop gastritis. Anything that could cause weakness in the mucus barrier lining the stomach walls can be a cause for concern. Risk factors include bacterial infection, excessive alcohol intake, stress, and old age. Gastritis is also a common side effect of certain types of medication. For example, the regular use of pain relieving medication such as aspirin, naproxen, and ibuprofen can have a profound effect on a person’s stomach lining. Another medication known to cause gastritis is the blood thinning drug called Xarelto.

While gastritis might seem like a minor condition, it can cause a host of complications when left untreated. The biggest danger is stomach ulcers and stomach bleeding. This is particularly true for gastritis caused by Xarelto, as the drug has been noted to cause adverse gastrointestinal bleeding in some cases. In rare instances, gastritis might also increase one’s risk of developing stomach cancer later in life.

Patients experiencing the early signs of gastritis will need to be sensitive to their symptoms and seek medical attention right away. In cases where gastritis is caused as a side effect to taking Xarelto, patients also have the choice to seek recourse through legal action against the drug’s manufacturers. As noted by Williams Kherkher Law Firm, the occurrence of such side effects happens when pharmaceuticals fail to fully disclose the possible effects caused by their products. Since gastritis can easily lead to alarming complications, patients taking Xarelto need to be aware of the risks involved in their treatment plans.


read more

As the body ages, health deteriorates and becomes more susceptible to certain medical conditions. Many of these medical conditions can be life-threatening or cause permanent health issues that diminish the quality of life for a person. One such disorder is gastrointestinal bleeding, or excessive bleeding in the digestive tract. Over 70 percent of upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in elderly patients or individuals over the age of 60.

Elderly men and women are more likely to suffer from comorbid illnesses such as pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. The most common occurrence of this is peptic ulcer disease. This is when there is mucosal damage to the gastrointestinal tract. This happens to around 500,000 people each year, of which the majority of cases are over the age of 50. Peptic ulcer disease is the leading cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients.

Diverticulosis is the most common reason for gastrointestinal bleeding in the lower digestive tract. This is a condition that constitutes the development of small pouches in the digestive tract, such as alone the wall of the colon or large intestine. According to the website of a lawyer from Williams Kherkher, gastrointestinal bleeding can cause severe pain and require expensive medical attention.

In order to treat the frequency of diseases and surgeries that may cause blood clots, anticoagulants are often prescribed to elderly patients to decrease the likelihood of heart attacks and strokes. However, the risk of bleeding incidents increases when blood thinners are present. Gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding out, and other excessive bleeding events may be fatal in these cases.

Xarelto is a highly prescribed blood thinner known to cause gastrointestinal bleeding in its patients, especially the elderly. The anticoagulant does not have a reversal agent, increasing the dangers of bleeding incidents of becoming critical. Consult an attorney if you or a loved one experienced any negative side effects after taking Xarelto. You may be entitled to compensation for lost wages, medical expenses, and other damages you suffered.


read more

A 19-year-old woman from Califronia who complained of a sore throat was offered leftover antibiotic prescribed to a friend that left her in dire straits because it turns out she was allergic to it. She developed what is referred to as Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) in which the patient can experience severe blisters, temporary or permanent blindness, and lingering photosensitivity.

While the exact drug was not specified in the reports on the case, it is speculated that it may have been the antibiotic Zithromax (azithromycin) manufactured by Pfizer Inc. which has been linked to SJS. The drug had not been prescribed to the unfortunate woman, which highlights the dangers of self-medication but it may also be argued that drug manufacturers should make it a point to warn the public and not just doctors about the risks associated with the drugs they sell, especially when it comes to possible allergic reactions as that associated with Zithromax.

But to bring the point a little further, Pfizer has been questioned about their transparency about the dire consequences of taking Zithromax by patients who may be allergic to it. Doctors know that they have to test for allergies before prescribing the drug, but patients rarely have access to this information. The labels are not clear about the dangers as well, merely alluding to the risks of giving the drug to children. This lack of adequate warning can expose Pfizer to civil litigation because the public has the right to know about the risks they may be exposed to when taking these products.

According to the website of Ritter Personal Injury, if you have been seriously injured from taking drugs that did not have clear and adequate warning about the possible risks, you could sue the drug manufacturer for compensation. Consult with a personal injury lawyer in your area to know your rights and legal options.


read more

Auto accidents happen every day in the US. In fact, nearly 4 (3.8) people died every day in auto accidents in the US in 2012, and that does not include the number of people that had been injured but survived.

It is a grim thought that every day in the US, four people will die unexpectedly. Except perhaps for psychics, people generally get into their vehicles believing that they will arrive at their destination safely. It is probably even worse for those who survive but end up seriously injured, even permanently disabled. They face weeks, months, maybe even years of surgery, rehabilitation, and recovery, and for some the costs can literally break them.

What makes it even more tragic is that many of these auto accidents are preventable. As discussed in the website of law firm Pohl Berk, negligent and reckless acts play a big part in causing these accidents, and the victims or their families may be able to get some compensation for their injuries and losses. But who is to blame?

The first party that comes to mind is the at-fault driver, and in some instances this is fully justified. Driver error accounts for many preventable accidents. However, it may not always be as clear-cut as that. Sometimes auto accidents happen because the vehicle of the at-fault driver malfunctioned. It could be a defective tire, a substandard ignition system, or faulty brakes. When the defective vehicle rather than the driver is to blame, everybody is a victim, but pinpointing the culprit can be difficult. It could be the auto maker, the parts manufacturer, the mechanic, the distributor, or the retailer, depending on the circumstances.

It would take significant resources to fully investigate an auto accident which may have been caused by negligence of some type. If you have been seriously injured or an immediate family member killed in a suspected negligent auto accident, you may be able to share the burden of the consequences. Consult with an experienced auto accident lawyer in your area for advice and assistance.


read more

Have you exhausted yourself trying to figure out how to find the right attorney? You can find one if you know what you’re looking for. This article can help you with that as you navigate your way through all of your options. Keep reading to find out more about this.

When you think about hiring a specialized lawyer, do you worry about the associated increase in fees? Well, what are you willing to pay for a positive outcome? Consider the cost of losing! Also consider that the savings in time of a specialist over a generalist will save you money, lowering the total bill.

If you already have a great lawyer, ask them for advice. They can either tell you that they can take on your case, or point you in the direction of a lawyer who will help you out. When you already have a lawyer you trust, there is no reason to search out advice elsewhere.

Do not pick a lawyer because you saw their ad on television or on a billboard. Many big firms that can afford this type of advertising use lawyers that are fresh out of school for most of their cases, but charge you for the experience held by its highest lawyers.

It is not a bad idea to speak up if your lawyer does or says anything you don’t understand, according to information from Pohl and Berk. They should be more than happy to explain anything to you, from what a fee is for to a document they’re having you sign. If your lawyer doesn’t want to talk about anything related to your case, drop them immediately.

Use the information you’ve just digested to help you find the right attorney for your case. You want to win your case, and you don’t want to take this decision lightly. Keep everything you’ve learned in mind as you find the lawyer that you can trust to help you through this time.


read more

Yaz and Yasmin are two oral contraceptives most recommended by doctors around the world. While both products came from Berlex, Inc., USA, an affiliate of Schering AG (from Germany), Yasmin was introduced in 2001, five years earlier than Yaz (Berlex Inc. is now part of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, after Bayer acquired Schering AG in 2007).

Yaz, in particular, gained the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval on March 16, 2006. The pill is known to prevent pregnancy more effectively than any other oral contraceptives; it works by preventing eggs to evolve, leaving the sperm without any egg to fertilize. Besides preventing pregnancy, Yaz was also recognized as an effective solution to moderate acne and bloating. Furthermore, it offered great relief to women experiencing anxiety and depression due to premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and premenstrual syndrome (PMS).

Yaz contains 24 active pills (that is hormone-induced pills) and only four inactive or palliative pills; other oral contraceptives have a 21 active and 7-inactive (placebo)-pill content. The purpose of the 24 active pills is simply to boost the amount of synthetic hormones (in the user) during the month-long regimen; the inactive or palliative pills are intended to reduce upsetting symptoms during, or days immediately before, monthly periods.

The greatest advantage of Yaz over other oral pills, though, is drospirenone, which is the more developed form of synthetic progesterone. Drospirenone is known to: ease menstrual-related symptoms, like water retention; potentially lessen low-density lipoprotein levels, blood pressure, and body weight; and, increase high-density levels of lipoprotein.

The popularity of Yaz was greatly affected, though, by a research conducted by Health Canada in the mid of 2013 that led to the discovery of the death of Canadian women between the years 2007 and 2013 (during these same years, more than 600 cases of Yaz or Yasmin adverse effects were recorded). These 23 Canadians, who have either taken Yaz or Yasmine and whose ages fell between 14 and 44, were said to have died suddenly, due to clotting of blood in the lungs (pulmonary embolism), heart attack, or cerebral thrombosis (blood clotting which blocked the supply of blood to the brain), after months of birth control pill use.

The National Injury Law Center mentions in an article posted in its website that in 2011 the FDA had an investigation conducted to evaluate further the safety of Yaz. Earlier than this, in 2009, the agency had already requested Bayer to include in the drug’s label the greater risk of developing blood clots in women who take it.

By July of 2013, the number of lawsuits filed against Yaz’s manufacturer has already exceeded 10,000; Bayer is also said to have paid about $1.4 billion in settlement, the claimants numbering to 6,760. Despite these, no recall of Yaz has been made yet – all due to the belief that its benefits still outweigh the risks.


read more